Sorry for the delayed response - i was 50 miles out at sea after siggraph!
thanks for trying out those things. we spoke internally, and we have a plan…
cheers
cb
Sorry for the delayed response - i was 50 miles out at sea after siggraph!
thanks for trying out those things. we spoke internally, and we have a plan…
cheers
cb
Good to hear that!
Could you share the plan?
Thanks,
once 5.1 goes out, we’ll work on performance enhancements which should hopefully address this problem [and others]. i dont want to speak about specifics until our internal tests work -but we’ll contact you to evaluate and test along with the usual suspects.
cb
Great to hear! Thank you.
Just a thought, would it be possible to have IIS serv the data instead of Pulse? Would it make any difference?
For example, we could have IIS serve the regular statistics data for the Monitor, and WebDAV (part of IIS) serve the actual files.
Again, just a though if that’d be something that could potentionally help speed things up. I am actually considering having IIS serve my files over HTTPS or regular HTTP even though I have VPN setup (which is a bit of a bottle neck as I have latencies about 15ms to and from my company server, but the response times are very much noticeable), so I am hoping to have my production data being prepared for me by WebDAV/IIS and the rest of the communication (licences etc…) being handled by the VPN.
We are exploring all of our options, and have a front runner in mind already. But like Chris said, we are still doing internal tests at the moment and I really can’t get into any specifics yet.
Cheers,
Sure thing. That’s understandable.
I’ll be looking forward to whatever you come up with. Thanks and best of luck!