dgp.toronto.edu/~rms/pubs/Im … TOG11.html
The video makes less sense if you haven’t read the paper. I wish they had the video that Jos Stam showed BEFORE he discussed the paper at the Fast Forward, it presented the problem quite clearly.
- Chad
dgp.toronto.edu/~rms/pubs/Im … TOG11.html
The video makes less sense if you haven’t read the paper. I wish they had the video that Jos Stam showed BEFORE he discussed the paper at the Fast Forward, it presented the problem quite clearly.
I liked the mesh in the three points rotating around center example. More like points moving under a skin instead of the whole mesh rotating. Same with the two that are splitting a much more uniform mesh bridges.
Thanks, that’s an interesting paper!
It’s the velocity that I was most interested in. The surface tracking is just the side effect of knowing the exact velocity. Getting the velocity from the particles gets you a good approximation of the velocity, but there’s a lot of cases where it falls down.
Oh I figured as much! I found the uniformity of the mesh a wonderful by-product.
BTW it was nice to finally meet in person