Is it within Stoke’s realm of possibilities to have some sort of Viscosity, even if fake? So that particles stick together given a parameter?
That is out of scope for Stoke which does not really do fluids - it just has an option to tweak a field to make it divergence-free. The individual particles have zero knowledge of each-other. All that Stoke does is apply velocities from other sources onto a bunch of particles.
The advanced stuff might be in the scope of another project. But there is no clear plan for that yet because, just like you, we want Ember to be priority #1 in the next months (and there is some more Krakatoa stuff coming soon too).
Ok, I thought it was worth asking anyway 
. Thanks!
which means - regarding the development of stoke - what?
regards,
fuat
Fuat, I don’t mean to speak for Thinkbox but I assume he means once Stoke is out the door. Don’t forget that Stoke was born out of Ember technology if I remember reading the early posts right. I don’t feel you have a reason to worry, they have been pretty good at supporting all their plugins with regular updates so far.
yeah, magmaflow in Krakatoa was partly improved by Genome, and i’m sure Ember will continue to inform Krakatoa, Frost, Stoke etc
cb
thanks for the info, i was just interested - didnt know stoke developed out of ember.
it´s all good!
cheers
fuat